In Firstpost, reporter Sreemoy Talukdar wrote, "The graceful-conversing televangelist's regressive and problematic teachings, completely dissected and discussed threadbare, strike in the pluralist cultural part of our existence and promotes a Model of Islam that is dreary and incompatible with the modern globe."[165]

" He provides: "The wave of Islamophobia from the aftermath of 9/11 plus the occupation of Iraq and Afghanistan have only included to your Muslims' perception of injury. In this type of predicament, any time a debater like Zakir Naik, in eloquent English, usually takes on preachers of other faiths and defeats them throughout debates, the Muslims' chests puff with delight. A Local community nursing an enormous feeling of betrayal and injustice naturally lionises anyone who offers it a sense of delight. Never head if It really is Phony pride."[159]

[39] Sushi Das on the Age commented that "Naik here extolled the moral and spiritual superiority of Islam and lampooned other faiths as well as the West generally speaking", more stating that Naik's words and phrases "fostered a spirit of separateness and bolstered prejudice".[40]

In accordance with Naik, the killing of any innocent human being, possibly Muslim or not is prohibited by Islam, though condemning the double-typical, played by the western powers and media who describes Muslims as extremists and fundamentalists.

precisely the same year, the preacher was banned from speaking in public in Malaysia, right after he allegedly created racial remarks in opposition to the country’s ethnic Hindus and Chinese communities. Naik later apologised for these remarks. Mahathir then claimed Naik was trying to “stir up religious thoughts”.

In 2016, Naik praised key Minister Narendra Modi for his frequent visits to Muslim greater part nations around the world, commenting "if his intention is to take care of unity involving Hindus and Muslims and in between India and other Muslim international locations, I am entirely for him". He explained Modi's visits as favourable for India, believing it could draw in overseas investment decision.[89] In 2019, within an job interview in Week magazine, Naik strongly criticized Modi plus the BJP for what he identified as Phony rates and propaganda against him for political applications, and reported that he is specific for his acceptance.

Zakir Abdul Karim Naik, fifty seven, is usually a fundamentalist Islamic preacher who fled India in 2016 amid expenses of spreading hatred and revenue laundering. When confronted with allegations of dislike speech, Naik has regularly preserved that his statements are “twisted” and “misrepresented”.

later on in 2010, Naik stated that he were quoted from context concerning the remarks on terrorism. "As far as terrorist is concerned", he claimed, "I explain to the Muslims that every Muslim must be a terrorist... What is the this means with the word terrorist?

Intercontinental media, whether it is print, audio, video clip, or on the internet, use several strategies to malign Islam by initial buying up the black sheep in the Muslim community, and portraying them as if They are really exemplary Muslims." Naik also claimed the "3rd and fourth" system by Intercontinental media is "to pick a term from Quran or sunnah and mistranslate it" and "to malign Islam by expressing a thing that isn't going to belong to it".[sixty one] Naik also criticizes the portrayal of Muslims in movies.[sixty one]

He additional the word "Jihad" basically suggests to try or wrestle against a person's very own evil inclinations, to create the Culture far better, in self-protection on a battlefield, and from oppression.[sixty one]

inside a independent speech, he states that "the western countries say war for peace, war for peace. It's not at all war for peace, it truly is war on peace". Naik's responses been given major media awareness and the British govt banned him on The premise of such feedback. Naik's attorney and IRF argued that the speech was produced ahead of nine/11, that media misquoted Naik and manufactured misleading assertions with regard to the timing of Naik's speech, and that the decision to ban Naik through the United kingdom was "politically determined".[80]

He is not obtaining machetes in fingers. But his followers are obtaining machetes in palms". She additional that, "I am not in opposition to Zakir Naik's totally free speech but I am in opposition to him for inciting violence. Fatwabaz ought to be banned from issuing."[153]

About Naik, the notification mentioned he continues to be “encouraging and aiding followers to market or try to boost, on grounds of faith, disharmony or inner thoughts of enmity, hatred or ill-will between distinctive spiritual communities and teams which happen to be prejudicial into the integrity and stability of the country.”

Naik equated songs with Liquor and stated that each are intoxicating in mother nature. He has opposed dancing and singing, professing that they are forbidden in Islam.[59]